Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by glerk on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:39PM
(#31671111)
As someone who didn't grow up in the American school system, I am a bit surprised that Algebra I in the 8th grade is considered "gifted education". If Algebra I is about solving linear equations with unknown variables, I am pretty sure I was taught this much earlier than 8th grade as part of the standard curriculum. But maybe this means something different in the United States.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by lights0123 on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:58PM
(#31671473)
Algebra I also generally includes systems of (2 or 3) linear equations, quadratics (different equation forms, factoring, graphing, solving) and basic exponential functions (although usually just recognizing them and filling in Ce^rt).
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by glerk on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @02:07PM
(#31671633)
Ah makes sense then. I remember seeing stuff like 3x+2=11 around the 4th grade, but definitely no quadratics or graphing functions until much later. Maybe the order the information is presented is just different and it doesn’t make sense to compare.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by anthonypasq on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @02:22PM
(#31671846)
i dont think so, thats all algebra 2
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by sokoloff on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @02:29PM
(#31671953)
That is not my experience. Systems of 2 linear equations ("intersecting lines") and quadratics were definitely part of Algebra I (and maybe even pre-Algebra).
I'm 95+% sure that basic exponentiation was also part of Algebra I.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by nonameiguess on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @04:03PM
(#31673219)
It's actually not. It's not clear from the way the article is written, but he's talking about two different things, both of which various reform bodies have proposed eliminating. The first is "gifted and talented education" programs, which involve additional coursework and activities on top of normal schooling. I'm not going to claim I remember super well what we did at this point, but I do remember learning how to make donuts from scratch, holding mock trials, learning computer-aided design at a time the regular school system didn't even have computers yet, and taking the SAT in 6th grade. All of these happened either after school or in the summer.
The other thing is related to tracking. That is where Algebra comes in. Not all students will take it at the same time. Instead, students are segregated into separate tracks, one of which will start with Algebra in middle school and eventually end up taking Calculus by the end of high school. The other won't get to Algebra until high school and will never take Calculus at all.
These are separate phenomena, but the author here is drawing an analogy between the reasons given for eliminating both GATE programs and educational tracking systems (as in, both are seen as being racially biased).