News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bird Is Laying Off 23% of Its Staff by tomcam on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @06:41AM (#31665456)
Because London is a 2000 year old city?
Re:Bird Is Laying Off 23% of Its Staff by mrcartmeneses on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @07:10AM (#31665687)
It’s the huge amount of space given to cars. Or did those exists 2000 years ago also?
Re:Bird Is Laying Off 23% of Its Staff by kitten_mittens_ on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @06:47AM (#31665496)
Walking on a roads was a thing (and still is in some places). Tokyo, for example.
Re:Bird Is Laying Off 23% of Its Staff by 13of40 on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @06:55AM (#31665562)
The place I'm in right now is supposedly a modern development but the sidewalks are in such disrepair / built over / covered in debris that everyone just walks in the road with the traffic.
Re:Bird Is Laying Off 23% of Its Staff by dijit on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @06:51AM (#31665530)
It’s been rebuilt many times since then, even discounting the bombing of World War Two which destroyed roughly 2 million homes (of approx 5 million at the time in London).

The great fire of London literally reduced the city by so much that practically the entire city was rebuilt; that was only 350y ago (not making the case that you’re wrong about it being old, but 2,000 years is unfortunately wrong)

Anyway, urban design is not set in stone.

It’s interesting to look at the evolution of Los Angeles as an example of a city that already exists being radically changed, entire blocks of buildings were demolished to make downtown roads so wide.

Re:Bird Is Laying Off 23% of Its Staff by sofixa on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @07:32AM (#31665833)
> It’s interesting to look at the evolution of Los Angeles as an example of a city that already exists being radically changed, entire blocks of buildings were demolished to make downtown roads so wide

I'm not sure giving LA, one of the poster cities for how not to do urban design, as an example, is a great idea.

Paris did the same thing, only in a much more measured fashion, in the 1760s under Haussmann and Napoléon III.

However destroying parts of a city which is thousands of years old just to increase the size of sidewalks would be to destroy historical monuments for minimal gains. If anything, making most small streets pedestrian and bike only sounds smarter.

Re:Bird Is Laying Off 23% of Its Staff by dijit on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @09:58AM (#31667439)
Wasn’t making the point that it was good but saying that urban design is locked in to “history” is the most common argument against good cycling infrastructure.

(and i was trying to correct the notion that the city of london has not had radical changes in its urban design for 2000 years)

Re:Bird Is Laying Off 23% of Its Staff by substation13 on Thursday June 09, 2022 @08:06AM (#31680157)
And funnily Paris is re-configuring the city for active travel right now!