News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Researchers discover way to 3D print directly inside the body without surgery.

Re:Researchers discover way to 3D print directly inside the ... by SideburnsOfDoom on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @05:50AM (#31665166)
So the material that is solidified by the "Flesh Penetrating Sound Waves" would be what - Body tissue? Injected resin? The excess resin would have to be harmlessly biodegradable.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Researchers discover way to 3D print directly inside the ... by euroderf on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @08:48AM (#31666482)
"Flesh Penetrating Sound Waves" sounds like a band in a David Cronenberg film.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Researchers discover way to 3D print directly inside the ... by SideburnsOfDoom on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:01PM (#31670345)
That's nice, but I'm seeing a distinct lack of substantive commentary on this post. What's up with that?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Researchers discover way to 3D print directly inside the ... by kennyadam on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @06:11AM (#31665289)
Why don't these scientists ever think about these obvious questions? If only everything could be run by programmers.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Researchers discover way to 3D print directly inside the ... by SideburnsOfDoom on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @06:16AM (#31665307)
That's an entirely misleading statement, and unnecessarily flippant delivery too.

I would say that the _article_ , which surely was not written by "these scientists", is very light on the important and interesting details. Possibly not aimed at a "programmers" audience.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Researchers discover way to 3D print directly inside the ... by spiralx on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @06:55AM (#31665563)
It literally says what materials they've used it with successfully and mentions what materials they're still aiming to be able to use.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Researchers discover way to 3D print directly inside the ... by SideburnsOfDoom on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @07:06AM (#31665663)
The single sentence about "polymer-metal composites" and "metal" raises more questions than it answers. To me, anyway.

I'm sure that "these scientists" are on the case, but the article not so much.

[ Parent | on HN ]