Embodiment is indispensable for AGI

Re:Embodiment is indispensable for AGI by tshaddox on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @12:12AM (#31663105)

Of course children can understand (and be fascinated with) questions like “can a robot feel sadness the same way I do?” or “can my classmate feel sadness the same way I do?” Children can also understand (and be fascinated with) questions like “do dogs go to heaven?”

But what is the epistemological status of these questions? That’s what I’m concerned with, not whether children can understand and be fascinated with these questions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Embodiment is indispensable for AGI by ImprobableTruth on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @04:52AM (#31664829)

Then I don't understand why you're acting like it's some vague, malformed question. The things you asked for, what the question is really asking, what problems would be solved and plausible answers are all blindingly clear.

Unless you're religious, the epistemic status of "do dogs go to heaven?" is obviously "no" (or "we have no way of knowing"). If you think the answer to "can robots experience qualia?" is equally trivial, then just say so, instead of going on some spiel about how actually the question is unclear and nonsensical when it pretty obviously isn't.

[ Parent | on HN ]