News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RSS Rant by ClintonWu on Thursday October 27, 2011 @06:18PM (#3165873)
This is one of the things we're working on at Start.Me (http://thestart.me) . We're trying to speed up your online browsing routine and figure out how to add both RSS and non-RSS sites to feeds without users necessarily having to know what RSS means; just what sites they want to keep up with. Would love anyone's feedback after we release something next week.
Re:RSS Rant by stdbrouw on Thursday October 27, 2011 @07:58PM (#3166195)
Not to be a debbie downer, but you can enter any website in Google Reader and get a feed subscription back too, without having to know what RSS means. (It doesn't, strictly speaking, work on non-RSS sites, true, but despite the recent trend we're talking about here, most sites still have 'em if you look hard enough.)

That said, it's a marketing thing. If you can make things click for the everyday joe, all the more power to you!

Re:RSS Rant by JeffJenkins on Friday October 28, 2011 @06:50AM (#3167739)
I had a site I used that feature for, but google took it away like a year ago
Re:RSS Rant by nhangen on Thursday October 27, 2011 @07:09PM (#3166036)
Could you try not loading a hover box on first page load? It looks like you're doing something neat, but I hate having to have 'no' as my first response.

Good work though.

Re:RSS Rant by altrego99 on Friday October 28, 2011 @02:52AM (#3167298)
Agreed, but there needs to be a mechanism to tell me how to use it. I like the idea of flicking around to browse, and this is not something I would have guessed without the info boxes.
Re:RSS Rant by ClintonWu on Friday October 28, 2011 @08:55AM (#3168040)
Yeah, we were really trying to get users to click the "Try Demo" button to bring up the info boxes that teach the flicking to navigate but I do hear both your thoughts on creating less friction at first interaction.