News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by suture on Monday June 06, 2022 @08:46AM (#31639762)
It is, I believe, beyond dispute that CO2 has heat trapping effects. All else remaining the same, increasing CO2 increases the heat. That at another time there was higher CO2 levels with lower heat merely means that not all else remained the same.
Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by prometheus76 on Monday June 06, 2022 @10:06AM (#31640670)
You just ignored all of the challenges to your current worldview. Cognitive dissonance is just as difficult for the people you are trying to convince as it appears to be for you.
Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by suture on Monday June 06, 2022 @10:25AM (#31640921)
I did no such thing. Increasing carbon dioxide, keeping all else equal, traps more heat. This isn’t disputable. Hence my refusal to say otherwise can’t possibly be cognitive dissonance.

It might be a good thing to increase CO2. It might be bad. It might be the case that increasing carbon dioxide causes counter balancing effects and therefore increasing CO2 does not increase temperature (I remain skeptical of this but I’m not a climate scientist). But what is beyond dispute is that massively increasing CO2 will cause climatic disruptions while the weather system reaches a new equilibrium.

Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by JumpCrisscross on Monday June 06, 2022 @10:53AM (#31641243)
> keeping all else equal

The reasonable pushback against this is per se isn't a realistic assumption in a system as dynamic as our biosphere.

Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by suture on Monday June 06, 2022 @11:01AM (#31641370)
Oh definitely. But it seems to me that it is obvious that increases in CO2 on a massive, rapid scale will necessitate climatic changes (not necessarily bad) as the system finds a new equilibrium. This may in turn cause massive disruptions to human societies.

Note that there are many seemingly obvious things that are false so I could be wrong.

Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by native_samples on Monday June 06, 2022 @11:32AM (#31641770)
"This may in turn cause massive disruptions to human societies."

The word "may" is doing a lot of work here. Lots of things may cause massive disruptions to human society. One thing we can say with certainty: the mitigation efforts being proposed to reduce CO2 levels will cause massive disruptions to human society.

[dead]
Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by snowwrestler on Monday June 06, 2022 @11:49AM (#31642010)
To answer your chemistry question, once a molecule of CO2 absorbs infrared light, it then emits infrared light.

On average it’s in a random direction, so some goes out into space eventually. But some goes straight toward the Earth’s surface, which also absorbs and then re-emits it.

The result is that some IR energy is trapped bouncing back and forth between the surface and atmospheric greenhouse gases (there are a few, not just CO2). This is the so-called “greenhouse effect” that keeps the surface habitable.

As you increase the amount of greenhouse gases, there are more molecules available to absorb and re-emit IR energy. So the total amount of energy that can be trapped bouncing back and forth goes up. More heat is trapped.

CO2 is particularly worrisome because the carbon cycle is slow. Water vapor has a larger effect, but it varies on the order of weeks (when it rains, for example). CO2 can take hundreds of years to get fixed again once it is in the atmosphere.

Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by suture on Monday June 06, 2022 @10:58AM (#31641320)
Like, wonder of wonders, by killing people and pouring their blood on a rock, the Mayans were successful, fantastic, amazing, keeping the sun moving across the sky!!!

The next time I teach correlation/causation I’m using this as my goto example.

Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by graycat on Monday June 06, 2022 @11:12AM (#31641528)
For a reference, as of

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

at

http://books.google.com/books?id=DgqLplWtGPgC&pg=PA76&lpg=PA...

(but not now, no longer)

from page 76 of

Susan Milbrath, Star Gods of the Maya: Astronomy in Art, Folklore, and Calendars (The Linda Schele Series in Maya and Pre-Columbian Studies), ISBN-13 978-0292752269, University of Texas Press, 2000.

with

"Indeed, blood sacrifice is required for the sun to move, according to Aztec cosmology (Durian 1971:179; Sahaguin 1950 - 1982, 7:8)."