What evidence do you have to support your claim? Many countries have been subjected to sanctions for years, yet their military power hasn't diminished significantly (NK, Iran, ...).
The misery of the poor and disenfranchised, which you dismiss as people not "having anything anyways", has however been much exacerbated.
Re:Sanctions and Strategic Bombing
by KptMarchewa on Saturday June 04, 2022 @06:19AM
(#31618743)
You must be joking if you think both countries military power haven't been effectively diminished. Only thing NK has going for them are nukes.
Iran too - they've been focused on reverse engineering cold war tech, which they did with mixed results.
It has diminished (or didn't grow) significantly. The only country I remember that still had really strong military after sanctions was Iraq.
These actions only galvanize a country further to be even more dependent on manufacturing weapons to defend themselves, become more self-sufficient, and potentially seize nearby resources from adjacent countries. The people that do leave tend to be the wealthy aristocracy with the resources to leave for their own selfish reasons.
> to defend themselves
contradicts
> potentially seize nearby resources from adjacent countries.
Re:Sanctions and Strategic Bombing
by turtledove on Saturday June 04, 2022 @10:54AM
(#31621004)
> Revolutions never happen in well fed society.
What? My understanding was that the revolution in Iran happened during a period of relative economic prosperity.
Those who can move -- move out of the country (usually the most economically active people), weakening the regime ability to make weapons.
Those who starve have nothing to lose, so they start fighting the regime. Revolutions never happen in well fed society.