News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by wonderbore on Saturday June 04, 2022 @01:01AM (#31617157)
I get this sentiment. "SEO" is basically an euphemism for spamming at this point. It's no longer just "Let's repeat this keyword 3 times" but "let's add 120 footer links and spam 35 blog comment sections per day"
Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by rickhaasteren on Saturday June 04, 2022 @02:13AM (#31617521)
That was SEO 15 years ago. If you think that still works, you’ll be disappointed.
Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by wonderbore on Saturday June 04, 2022 @02:43AM (#31617681)
I don’t think it’s how it works because I see that crap daily in footers, especially in the travel industry. Open any hotel listing on TripAdvisor and count the “[something] in [location]” links in the footer.
Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by Veen on Saturday June 04, 2022 @03:00AM (#31617766)
How do you think Google knows which pages are helpful when someone searches for “[something] in [location]”? Anchor text in links plays a key role, but with search listings on sites like TripAdvisor, it’s tricky to naturally insert those links into content. Footer links is one way to do it.

I’d agree With you if those links were misleading, but they usually aren’t. They really do point to pages with “[something] in [location]”. And they really are helpful for search engines looking to give useful results for that type of query.

Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by rickhaasteren on Saturday June 04, 2022 @04:12AM (#31618093)
“I saw some hotel websites with location links in their footer, so that must be what the SEO industry is all about”

Sure.

Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by wonderbore on Saturday June 04, 2022 @06:23AM (#31618765)
You don’t get it. “Link building” is not 2007 stuff. You find 2022 articles with that. If you don’t believe it it’s not my problem.
Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by rickhaasteren on Saturday June 04, 2022 @06:52AM (#31618919)
Link building is still very relevant. But comment spam isn’t 2022 linkbuilding.

Sure, people still do that. Doesn’t mean that’s representative for the SEO industry.

Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by rchaud on Saturday June 04, 2022 @11:05AM (#31621145)
yeah but the 2022 article was written in 2010. It just has a "Last Updated: 2022" because Google is dumb and falls for that every time.
Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by rickhaasteren on Saturday June 04, 2022 @04:36PM (#31624799)
Yeah Google is super dumb. Worst search engine ever. Thank god ahrefs is spending 60m to build something better
Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by stalkerman on Saturday June 04, 2022 @03:05AM (#31617792)
Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by wonderbore on Saturday June 04, 2022 @06:24AM (#31618775)
It’s that a listing on TripAdvisor? It’s not.
Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by rchaud on Saturday June 04, 2022 @11:04AM (#31621141)
Travel, huh? I wonder if clickbaity links show up for things like life insurance, weight loss, and personal injury lawyers.

Don't blame SEO because capitalism necessitated that businesses use whatever means possible to get their product in front of your face.

Re:Yep: Google alternative that shares revenue with creators... by wonderbore on Sunday June 05, 2022 @12:15AM (#31627961)
Thankfully I don't have to deal with any of those so travel websites is what I look at the most.