News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:40k coin tosses yield ambiguous evidence for dynamical bias by JulianWasTaken on Friday June 03, 2022 @12:47PM (#31610692)
> there aren't any real world cases where you can win money (or gain any advantage) just by tossing a coin a certain way.

Paying off a referee to have the coin turn up heads in overtime in a football game seems like it may net you some profit.

Re:40k coin tosses yield ambiguous evidence for dynamical bias by aidenn0 on Friday June 03, 2022 @04:46PM (#31613401)
I believe NFL coin tosses let the coin hit the ground. All methods I know of biasing a coin toss involve catching the coin. As long as the coin hits the ground and bounces at least once, a lot of randomness is re-introduced.
Re:40k coin tosses yield ambiguous evidence for dynamical bias by paxys on Friday June 03, 2022 @01:08PM (#31610959)
If you can pay off a referee then the coin toss would be the least effective way to do it. A single bad call would gain you a much bigger advantage.
Re:40k coin tosses yield ambiguous evidence for dynamical bias by dTal on Friday June 03, 2022 @01:33PM (#31611274)
It has far more plausible deniability, however.
Re:40k coin tosses yield ambiguous evidence for dynamical bias by bluGill on Friday June 03, 2022 @04:17PM (#31613123)
Maybe. It only takes one bad call at the right time to throw a game. If the ref is consistently bad and missing call for both sides what is one more bad call?

I don't care much about bad refs so long as they are consistently bad. However a perfect ref who missing one critical call is a lot more suspicious. Of course I prefer a great ref, but I can work with a fairly bad ref.