News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communicati... by ajmurmann on Thursday June 02, 2022 @09:03PM (#31602894)
Because you might be friendly with coworkers and not always switch platform as the topic transitions.
Re:Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communicati... by dj_mc_merlin on Thursday June 02, 2022 @09:14PM (#31602996)
> not always switch platform as the topic transitions

My point is, you totally should. I am friendly with my coworkers too, if I want to have a non "work-friendly" talk with them, we talk in the kitchen or at the pub. It baffles me that people would use a work provided form of communication and _not_ assume it's auditable in some way.

edit: should clarify that my work is probably more calm than most and would probably not GAF about it regardless.. but it's just good opsec. Never write something down you wouldn't be comfortable having read out to you if it can be traced back to you.

Re:Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communicati... by ajmurmann on Thursday June 02, 2022 @09:21PM (#31603048)
Your original question was about "personal conversations". I don't think all personal conversations fall into the category of things I wouldn't write down. If I remember that I need to ask my coworker about dietary restrictions for going out together on the weekend while we are talking about our db problems, I won't necessarily switch to Signal for that.
Re:Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communicati... by dj_mc_merlin on Thursday June 02, 2022 @09:27PM (#31603099)
Then we misunderstood each other. In that case there is no need to change platforms at all -- no one is ever going to penalize you for talking about dietary restrictions or similar topics. If you want to talk about looking for jobs, how much you hate your wife, or what an asshole your boss is, that should obviously not be done in a way that it could ever be traced to you. Failing to do that makes the situation at least half your fault, what did you expect?
Re:Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communicati... by yencabulator on Friday June 03, 2022 @11:08AM (#31609336)
It's more the delusion that you can casually maintain perfect opsec. People committing actual crimes regularly get caught by those slip-ups, of course you too will have slip-ups in your every day life.
Re:Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communicati... by killjoywashere on Friday June 03, 2022 @01:53AM (#31604729)
You should read the report on Brett Goldstein: he was forced out of government for using signal.
Re:Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communicati... by wardedVibe on Thursday June 02, 2022 @09:37PM (#31603172)
They also built tools to detect when you're doing that
Re:Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communicati... by dj_mc_merlin on Thursday June 02, 2022 @09:44PM (#31603220)
Unless they're recording my conversation at the pub I do not see how (very illegal where I live, I'm hoping illegal everywhere). Care to link an example?
Re:Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communicati... by bentcorner on Thursday June 02, 2022 @10:43PM (#31603632)
I'm hoping the comment you're replying to is implying that if you switch to a non-work communication platform while still using corporate assets and infrastructure you can still be tracked, which makes perfect sense.