News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WaMu Fails. First major comercial bank to go. by davidw on Friday September 26, 2008 @09:08AM (#316004)
Because the shareholders, the owners of the company, are free to piss away their money as they so choose.

I think there is an argument to be made for better, more transparent corporate governance rules, that would make it easier for the shareholders to say "uh, no" to stuff like this, but it's ultimately their money.

(BTW, I am not a Republican).

Re:WaMu Fails. First major comercial bank to go. by pstuart on Friday September 26, 2008 @10:30AM (#316080)
The shareholders are not making these decisions (directly), the Board of Directors is. And who is on the BOD? Why other CEOs who expect their actions to be reciprocated. This is [logrolling](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logrolling).

The talk about short term profit taking being driven by the market is BS as well. If a company were to take actions that would depress its earning in the short term for the sake of (demonstrable) long term growth and profits, the smart segment of the market would recognize that and respond favorably.

One partial solution: outlaw stock options in publicly traded companies. Use cash bonuses and have the usual Employee Stock Purchase Plan that provides a 15% discount on investing in the company.

Re:WaMu Fails. First major comercial bank to go. by anamax on Friday September 26, 2008 @10:49AM (#316104)
The shareholders are choosing where they put their money.

Shareholders could choose to buy stock based on how the CEO is paid but few do.