Re:The rise and fall of Cathie Wood, controversial Wall Stre...
by cuteboy19 on Monday May 30, 2022 @02:51AM
(#31556129)
Purposefully taking a loss never makes sense tax wise. Harvesting or no harvesting
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The rise and fall of Cathie Wood, controversial Wall Stre...
by sgjohnson on Monday May 30, 2022 @03:57AM
(#31556540)
It absolutely does, if you can overvalue something and get away with it, and then sell it for an actually fair market price.
This way you get to post a net loss.
Re:The rise and fall of Cathie Wood, controversial Wall Stre...
by Ntrails on Monday May 30, 2022 @08:07AM
(#31558144)
Manufacturing a fake loss with a false valuation is not the same thing at all - you've just said that "if you can do fraud, then sure there's money to be made from losses". Fraud makes money? Sure! Losses do not.
Re:The rise and fall of Cathie Wood, controversial Wall Stre...
by refurb on Monday May 30, 2022 @07:30AM
(#31557879)
God I love HN.
Tax are due on capital gains which is basically <sale price> minus <purchase price>.
You can't claim a capital loss unless you paid the overvalued price. And then you just lost money anyways.
Re:The rise and fall of Cathie Wood, controversial Wall Stre...
by salawat on Monday May 30, 2022 @02:01PM
(#31561732)
It's not so much just HN.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/taxgainlossharvesting.a...
It is literally a thing. I cannot for the life of me make sense of how to make it work that doesn't strike me as off, but enough people get utility out of the moniker that it's got a page. So...
Re:The rise and fall of Cathie Wood, controversial Wall Stre...
by refurb on Monday May 30, 2022 @02:06PM
(#31561795)
That’s not the same thing.
Tax loss harvesting is real, you just time when you take a loss to offset a gain. Then immediately reinvest. You haven’t lost any money in total, you can just claim the loss on your taxes (but will pay higher capital gains in the future).