News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Terraform should have remained stateless. Parent comment

Re:Terraform should have remained stateless by rad_gruchalski on Saturday May 28, 2022 @04:16PM (#31543404)
Seen this many times. People using a tool in an unintended manner and then bashing the tool.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Terraform should have remained stateless by mountainriver on Tuesday May 31, 2022 @08:39AM (#31568822)
Huh so you access your infra through terraform?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Terraform should have remained stateless by tedivm on Tuesday May 31, 2022 @09:46AM (#31569423)
This conversation is embarrassing for both of you.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Terraform should have remained stateless by rad_gruchalski on Wednesday June 01, 2022 @12:39PM (#31584472)
Tell me more please. There’s always something new to learn.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Terraform should have remained stateless by mountainriver on Tuesday May 31, 2022 @12:31PM (#31571547)
its super embarrassing if you thing TF is the source of truth when the cloud provider clearly is
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Terraform should have remained stateless by rad_gruchalski on Wednesday June 01, 2022 @12:48PM (#31584596)
My infrastructure drifts from my source of truth.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Terraform should have remained stateless by rad_gruchalski on Wednesday June 01, 2022 @12:41PM (#31584492)
Through an API, really.
[ Parent | on HN ]