Re:FTC fines Twitter $150M for using 2FA phone numbers for a...
by account42 on Monday May 30, 2022 @04:54AM
(#31556884)
> It's objectively worse, dramatically increasing the attack surface
Any 2FA - no matter how weak - should in theory not be weaker than no 2FA. In practice of course these things can often be used as the only factor to "recover" access to an account so yes, weak 2FA like SMS can make things worse.
By default, someone can call up your cellular provider, claim to be you, pass trivial to no security questions, and request a replacement SIM be mailed out, or that your number be ported to another device. Or they can slip a bit of cash to any employee who works at any cell phone store that sells service for your carrier.
SMS 2FA isn't better than just a password. It's objectively worse, dramatically increasing the attack surface. Compromise someone's cell phone account and you are virtually guaranteed access to their bank/retirement/investment accounts, email, social media, etc. And they are virtually powerless to do anything about it for at least a few hours while they scramble to, say, get phone service working again and rush to contact everyone they can think of. By the time you're able to even get to your bank to talk to a branch manager and show all sorts of proof of identity, your accounts could be long since cleaned out.
Some providers finally are offering secondary passwords for porting/SIM replacement, that sort of thing. Absolutely call them and request your account be locked down as much as possible, ask to specify a secondary password, etc.