News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New England's Largest Battery Is Hidden Inside a Mass. Mo... by hp48fan on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @09:03PM (#31512996)
My guess is that the cycle efficiency would be a simple Carnot cycle, and since the delta(T) is small the efficiency would be minuscule and you never measure the difference, never mind pay back the glass.

Your better off putting floating solar panels on top

Re:New England's Largest Battery Is Hidden Inside a Mass. Mo... by jakzurr on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:25PM (#31514085)
Not Carnot, it's mechanical. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumped-storage_hydroelectricit...

It's not 100%, but it's not bad.

Re:New England's Largest Battery Is Hidden Inside a Mass. Mo... by olau on Thursday May 26, 2022 @04:42AM (#31516092)
The comment you're replying to is discussing using heat for pressure, not electrical pumps.
Re:New England's Largest Battery Is Hidden Inside a Mass. Mo... by jakzurr on Thursday May 26, 2022 @07:22AM (#31517041)
Ah, you're absolutely right, that was my mistake. hp48fan seems correct that it would make a minuscule difference.
Re:New England's Largest Battery Is Hidden Inside a Mass. Mo... by 41b696ef1113 on Thursday May 26, 2022 @12:03AM (#31514359)
Are floating solar panels a thing? My naive assumption is that (most places) land is abundant enough that you can put solar panels everywhere. Dealing with the nature-hates-you-engineering of working with water seems like a method of last resort.
Re:New England's Largest Battery Is Hidden Inside a Mass. Mo... by ZeroGravitas on Thursday May 26, 2022 @09:16AM (#31517933)
You get co-benefits of reducing water evaporation and plant growth (some places just use plastic balls for this same purpose) on the water side and on the solar side you get some cooling which increases efficiency.

For existing dams the ability to share the existing connections in an area that probably isn't flat except for the water is neat.