News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by CoryAlexMartin on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @06:15PM (#31511382)
I'm thinking some manufacturers might be catching on to the downsides of touchscreen controls. I did a test drive of the previous generation Honda Civic, and it had touchscreen climate controls. I wound up getting a 2022 Honda Civic which has physical dials for all climate controls.

Though, as an aside, dials for temperature and fan speed are fine, but they also use a dial for changing which vents the air comes out of, which makes no sense. Also, the dials rotate infinitely, even though the ranges are finite. It means I still have to look to see what the setting is at, instead of being able to tell by feel.

By comparison, the 1992 Honda Civic climate controls are way better: https://i.imgur.com/r8JjjNw.png

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by antisthenes on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @06:23PM (#31511478)
> Though, as an aside, dials for temperature and fan speed are fine, but they also use a dial for changing which vents the air comes out of, which makes no sense. Also, the dials rotate infinitely, even though the ranges are finite. It means I still have to look to see what the setting is at, instead of being able to tell by feel.

Yikes. I know I'm just a nobody on the internet, but if I worked at Honda in any position of power, I would do everything in my power to get the people responsible for rubber-stamping this fired.

This is unacceptable for a modern vehicle.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by CoryAlexMartin on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @06:35PM (#31511649)
Regardless of how bad it is, it's a step up from touchscreen interfaces, which means it actually is acceptable by modern vehicle standards.

But I agree that by objective standards, it's unacceptable.