Re:Leslie Lamport revolutionized computer science with math ...
by charcircuit on Tuesday May 24, 2022 @09:16PM
(#31499523)
Driving AI doesn't require continuous input variables. Approximations are good enough in the real world.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Leslie Lamport revolutionized computer science with math ...
by kevhito on Tuesday May 24, 2022 @10:48PM
(#31500053)
What do you mean? All the inputs are continuous: light sensors, LIDAR, infra-red, inputs from mechanical sensors from the driver. Sure, the sensor package's hardware/firmware/software converts these to discrete inputs before it reaches the Driving AI, but all of the Buridan's Paradox results still apply to those sensor packages. They can't perform their tasks in a finite amount of time -- either they will sometimes fail to make a decision at all, or they will render an invalid output (e.g. rather than outputting voltage corresponding to logical 0 or 1, they will go into a meta-stable or astable output mode that is not a valid output voltage).
Re:Leslie Lamport revolutionized computer science with math ...
by charcircuit on Tuesday May 24, 2022 @11:17PM
(#31500229)
>rather than outputting voltage corresponding to logical 0 or 1, they will go into a meta-stable or astable output mode that is not a valid output voltage
It sounds like you could easily avoid this. You can use a microprocessor and lead in analog input on one pin and then set an output pin based off that. You will always output a valid voltage. Sensors have noise anyways so it's not a big deal if the output is slightly wrong.