News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Imagen, a text-to-image diffusion model by y04nn on Monday May 23, 2022 @05:33PM (#31485035)
Really impressive. If we are able to generate such detailed images, is there anything similar for text to music? I would I though that it would be simpler to achieve than text to image.
Re:Imagen, a text-to-image diffusion model by redox99 on Monday May 23, 2022 @05:48PM (#31485195)
Our language is much more effective at describing images than music.
Re:Imagen, a text-to-image diffusion model by touringa on Monday May 23, 2022 @06:32PM (#31485669)
Re:Imagen, a text-to-image diffusion model by tomatowurst on Monday May 23, 2022 @05:52PM (#31485235)
why stop at audio? the pinnacle of this would be text-to-videos, equally indistinguishable from real thing.
Re:Imagen, a text-to-image diffusion model by burlesona on Monday May 23, 2022 @06:09PM (#31485438)
The way things look when still is much easier to fake than the way things move.

I would expect AI development to follow a similar path to digital media generally, as its following the increasing difficulty and space requirements of digitally representing said media: text < basic sounds < images < advanced audio < video.

What’s more impressive to me is how far ahead text-to-speech is, but I think the explanation is straightforward (the accessibility value has motivated us to work on that for a lot longer).

Re:Imagen, a text-to-image diffusion model by nomel on Monday May 23, 2022 @05:41PM (#31485127)
Compare the size of a raw image file to a raw music file, to get an idea of the complexity difference.
Re:Imagen, a text-to-image diffusion model by penneyd on Monday May 23, 2022 @05:49PM (#31485212)
Think sheet music, not an mp3
Re:Imagen, a text-to-image diffusion model by nomel on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:58PM (#31507228)
Fair enough, but that's a little dissimilar to what's being done with these images. These images are a per-pixel construction.