> Note, I doubt that this is actually true, but I wanted to highlight your moral apriori claims as ridiculous.

You failed to do that:

You didn’t address the agency problem where the 15 chose to engage in risky behavior while that 1 was coerced into dying — and ignoring the role of agency in the Trolley Problem is amateur hour. The helmets didn’t kill anyone, their following choices while wearing helmets did; which is in contrast to mandating no helmet, that is directly responsible for a death.

What you did was make a ridiculous argument that ignored the crux of the issue and pretend that the other person was wrong.