News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New York rolling out noise law, listening tech for souped... by t-3 on Saturday May 21, 2022 @12:51AM (#31455319)
Pushing the blame for externalities onto some nebulous other is antisocial though. It's a way of absolving yourself and others of the responsibility of agency and creating change. Limiting the definition to actions which directly "disrupt" others is simply a way for the privileged to export their antisocial behavior to ethically unburdened faceless corporations.

Is it practical to stop reading because a tree gets cut or your ereader needs charging? Probably not, but that's why change doesn't happen until it's forced by the circumstances.

Re:New York rolling out noise law, listening tech for souped... by Manuel_D on Saturday May 21, 2022 @02:09AM (#31455665)
Most paper is recycled (over 2/3rd). So no, it's not antisocial.

Regardless, it's still a false equivalency to try and equate directly antisocial behavior like making loud noises that disrupt people's healthy sleep and the sustainability of producing paper, some of which is used for printing novels that people read in their homes.

Re:New York rolling out noise law, listening tech for souped... by giantg2 on Saturday May 21, 2022 @09:37AM (#31457773)
There's no claim of total equivalency. Only that they meet the poorly formed definition given previously