Re:OnlyFans creator stalked and had sex with Meta employees ...
by krageon on Friday May 20, 2022 @10:33AM
(#31447983)
If you read what actually happened you can see that all proper internal procedures were followed. Corruption heavily implies that something that exists for other people is (temporarily) removed, or some requirement is waived as a result of compensation. That is not what happened.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OnlyFans creator stalked and had sex with Meta employees ...
by austinkhale on Friday May 20, 2022 @10:38AM
(#31448059)
If internal procedures allow Meta employees to be paid (in cash or favors of any kind) to be internal champions for repeatedly resubmitting bans to the Integrity Team roulette appeals process, “proper” is the opposite of the word I would use to describe the practice.
Re:OnlyFans creator stalked and had sex with Meta employees ...
by altairprime on Friday May 20, 2022 @11:34AM
(#31448868)
That’s how “friends and family” policies work, though: the company gives you perks to bestow upon your friends, so that they can trade their relationship with you for a benefit.
Re:OnlyFans creator stalked and had sex with Meta employees ...
by enumjorge on Friday May 20, 2022 @10:50AM
(#31448242)
She used sexual favors to get an employee to unban the account that shouldn’t have been banned in the first place. I doubt those are proper procedures as defined by Meta’s guidelines.
Re:OnlyFans creator stalked and had sex with Meta employees ...
by GlassKingdom on Friday May 20, 2022 @10:36AM
(#31448016)
It’s “corruption” by any credible meaning of the word. If the story is true then it’s a catastrophe for Meta.