News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rust: A Critical Retrospective by cb321 on Thursday May 19, 2022 @04:34PM (#31439828)
>Nim does not have something which gives

You are simply incorrect, appear unwilling to research why/appear absolutist rather than curious, and have made clear that what I think is "clarification" or "detail expansion" you deem "tedious" or "nitpicking" while simultaneously/sarcastically implicitly demanding more details. That leaves little more for me to say.

Re:Rust: A Critical Retrospective by Aeolun on Thursday May 19, 2022 @07:06PM (#31441345)
It would be helpful if you pointed out the Nim memory management method that works the same as the Rust one.
Re:Rust: A Critical Retrospective by j-james on Monday May 23, 2022 @06:49PM (#31485827)
Re:Rust: A Critical Retrospective by avgcorrection on Thursday May 19, 2022 @04:55PM (#31440045)
You have managed to point out that tracing garbage collection and reference counting are indeed two ways to manage memory automatically. Three cheers for your illuminating clarification.
Re:Rust: A Critical Retrospective by avgcorrection on Friday May 20, 2022 @07:03AM (#31445728)
Sorry about being an arse. I got frustrated by all the talking-past-each-other.