News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Plagiarized in a plagiarism atonement essay. Parent comment

Re:Plagiarized in a plagiarism atonement essay by withinboredom on Wednesday May 18, 2022 @11:12AM (#31423788)
The author still had to write the prompt, edit it, etc. these are still skills that are (imho) more valuable than the writing itself. It is no more “assistive” than turning “waht” into “what”. In both cases the computer must infer what I mean and replace it with the appropriate string.

Legalities do matter here. The definition is “taking someone else’s work.” AI (currently) has no rights and no ownership. It is an “it” and not a “someone.” You are using a tool, an advanced tool that should be dealt with on a case by case basis. IOW, “don’t bring a graphing calculator.”

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Plagiarized in a plagiarism atonement essay by karatinversion on Wednesday May 18, 2022 @12:53PM (#31424980)
No, this does not enter into it at all. The universities set their assessment policies how they see reasonable, and will generally not allow auto-generated text. Just like it is not illegal to have a smartphone in an exam, but you can still be failed for it if it’s against the rules of the university.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Plagiarized in a plagiarism atonement essay by withinboredom on Wednesday May 18, 2022 @01:30PM (#31425391)
Not to be tooo pedantic, but you agree spellcheck is against the rules? It’s “auto-generated text.”

But it appears we are on the same page. If it’s directly against the rules, that’s different (like bringing an advanced calculator to an elementary math exam). But it def isn’t plagiarism.

[ Parent | on HN ]