Re:Unsolved problems in economics
by colinmhayes on Tuesday May 17, 2022 @11:50AM
(#31412458)
You are right, wikipedia is not a great source for economics. I just reached for it first because it's generally decent for most things. You can find a great definition in https://bankicollege.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Princi... but simply it's difference between the surplus before and after an intervention. Obviously minimizing deadweight loss isn't our end goal, it's just one measure we can use to compare interventions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Unsolved problems in economics
by Hermitian909 on Tuesday May 17, 2022 @12:05PM
(#31412677)
While not an economist, I've read enough economic papers that I actually agree with Wikipedia's definition. You can "plug-in" values to your dead weight loss calculation depending on judgement calls. For example, do you consider the fact that the carbon footprint of an object is ignored a subsidy? If so, your dead weight loss calculation changes. Suddenly you're trying to discount cash flow against the future cost of carbon removal and things are very complicated.