`curl wttr.in`: Weather in your terminal

Re:`curl wttr.in`: Weather in your terminal by teddyh on Sunday May 15, 2022 @06:56AM (#31386737)

When writing these things, I prefer using the “sleep” command as the while condition. This way, the loop is easier to break out of. I.e. when I press Ctrl-C, the sleep command returns a non-zero exit code, and the while loop terminates gracefully:

  while sleep 60; do clear; curl -s wttr.in; done

Otherwise, I very often get a loop which stubbornly refuses to abort, and I have to hammer both Ctrl-C and Ctrl-\ to make it stop. The downside is, of course, that I have to wait 60 seconds (in this case) the first time. When this is a problem, I just unroll the loop slightly and add an extra invocation to the beginning:

  clear; curl -s wttr.in; while sleep 60; do clear; curl -s wttr.in; done

This could be generalized into a terminal watch function:

  termwatch(){ delay="$1"; shift; clear; "$@"; while sleep "$delay"; do clear; "$@"; done; }

  termwatch 60 curl -s wttr.in

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:`curl wttr.in`: Weather in your terminal by Kim_Bruning on Sunday May 15, 2022 @07:39AM (#31386934)

Thanks for your help igor_chubin and teddyh!

According to The Fine Manual: watch --color (-c for short) , should render color correctly, eg.

    watch --color ls --color

but

    watch --color curl -s v2.wttr.in

doesn't quite play ball.

In the end I went with something like your solution. I didn't need to put the sleep 60 as the first operation though.

    #!/bin/bash
    while true; do
      clear 
      curl -s v2.wttr.in
      sleep 100
    done

^C breaks out of this loop just fine on my system.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:`curl wttr.in`: Weather in your terminal by teddyh on Sunday May 15, 2022 @08:01AM (#31387047)

> ^C breaks out of this loop just fine on my system.

It might be different when run as a script (with a separate shell process) to when run as an explicit loop in an interactive shell, or a shell function.

[ Parent | on HN ]