News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rich Hickey: "Simple Made Easy" from Strange Loop 2011 [v... by swah on Thursday October 20, 2011 @08:15PM (#3137735)
I kinda regret having chosen Clojure for my project. Its not that I can't express ideas in very little code, its just that my workflow is different from languages like Python.

In Clojure, it seems that I can't apply the method of spike solution (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?SpikeSolution) and then refactor it into working code like I do with languages like Python or C.

Re:Rich Hickey: "Simple Made Easy" from Strange Loop 2011 [v... by jcromartie on Thursday October 20, 2011 @10:36PM (#3138104)
I'm wondering what about spikes doesn't work in Clojure? I usually understand a spike as a "proof of concept" that doesn't handle all of the edge cases.
Re:Rich Hickey: "Simple Made Easy" from Strange Loop 2011 [v... by seancorfield on Thursday October 20, 2011 @10:59PM (#3138162)
I'm curious why you feel you can't create spike solutions in Clojure?
Re:Rich Hickey: "Simple Made Easy" from Strange Loop 2011 [v... by swah on Friday October 21, 2011 @08:53AM (#3139485)
Probably because pseudocode in my head is imperative.
Re:Rich Hickey: "Simple Made Easy" from Strange Loop 2011 [v... by mnemonicsloth on Saturday October 22, 2011 @01:36PM (#3143905)
I think that's normal. Part of learning Clojure is learning to think in another kind of pseudocode.

What does this imply about the languages you already know?