News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Windows Terminal Source Code by rbanffy on Wednesday May 11, 2022 @05:33PM (#31346110)
> It's a decent terminal emulator, but could use several enhancements and the community could help.

It's the only modern terminal that passes the VT torture test. It supports double width and double height characters (great for terminal error messages).

It doesn't support overline (which is awesome for status lines at the bottom of the screen) and requires font support for line drawing and block graphics (Unicode 13 introduced 2x3 blocks and the next one will introduce 2x4s).

> There's something about using default apps as much as possible that appeals to me

For me it's one less thing to distract my distraction-prone brain.

Re:Windows Terminal Source Code by tambourine_man on Wednesday May 11, 2022 @09:04PM (#31347990)
Better keyboard only text selection, vertical/horizontal splits (I know about tmux, I still prefer scrolling and searching on true app), true color support, image visualizing would be nice.
Re:Windows Terminal Source Code by Komodai on Wednesday May 11, 2022 @05:52PM (#31346345)
VT torture test?
Re:Windows Terminal Source Code by DHowett on Wednesday May 11, 2022 @06:14PM (#31346576)
I think rbanffy is referring to vttest[1], but I'm not certain.

[1]: https://www.invisible-island.net/vttest/

EDIT to add: vttest is maintained by the current maintainer of xterm. It's the "torturiest" VT test I know of.

Re:Windows Terminal Source Code by rbanffy on Wednesday May 11, 2022 @09:24PM (#31348089)
No. Not this one. It's too much work to test everything. A much more concise can be used from:

     curl -q http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/multimedia/animation/vt100-animation/torturetest.vt
On a real terminal, you'll be able to see even the smooth scrolling function that AFAIK no windowed terminal implements.
Re:Windows Terminal Source Code by DHowett on Wednesday May 11, 2022 @09:51PM (#31348290)
Whoa, thanks! It looks like I’ve got some reading to do.
Re:Windows Terminal Source Code by rbanffy on Friday May 13, 2022 @01:06PM (#31370117)
Next steps would be supporting Tektronix and ReGIS graphics.

Sixel graphics are a terrible idea.