£95k would be exceptionally good for the vast majority of the UK, and unless you’re trying to buy a house in central London or something it would still be a very good wage there too. Take the last bit with a pinch of salt though—I’ve never lived in London but a number of my friends do.

Keep in mind that taxes eat quite a bit of that (seemingly more so than in the US).

US taxes are similar to UK taxes, particularly in california. Putting £95k into Salary Calculator [0] says you take home ~67% of your salary after taxes. £95k is ~$120k today, and putting that into this [1] calculator says you take home ~64% of your salary.

[0] https://www.thesalarycalculator.co.uk/salary.php

[1] https://smartasset.com/taxes/california-paycheck-calculator#...

So the UK is taxed lower than California? And we have more public services?

What do they spend it on?

Mainly military budget if you google it.

A common American complaint is "subsidizing" European defense off of our tax dollars.

America is also a big spread out place so maintaining it is more expensive than small Euro countries.

On my first point, I think we get a rather strategic advantage from being the "Western" police. However I'm just explaining a common critique you'll hear.

California pays for NATO?

Other states might end up having similar tax rates, i was just curious what made Californias so high. If that is mostly federal income tax then never mind!

I've no idea what the breakdown of federal vs state tax is sorry, and I actually don't even know how to find out. I'm just a european engineer that has genuinely looked into moving and picked california as a point of reference purely due to the high salaries and QOL factors.

This is why NATO countries need to work harder to meet the 2% defense investment guideline. US citizens are basically paying for the safety of everyone else.

How does that balance out with health insurance premiums?