News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IBM's Asshole Test by deathanatos on Thursday May 05, 2022 @12:39AM (#31269551)
I had a flight attendant admonish me for being out of my seat when the fasten seatbelt light was on. But honestly, she was right: it was way too turbulent and my butt ought to have been in a seat. Problem was that nature was calling and the turbulence seemed interminable, and wasn't helping with the nature's call part.

(I ended up taking a seat in the rear for a bit & riding it out until a slightly smoother portion. Still had to bend the rules a bit. I owe you for your patience, flight attendant…)

Although, on one flight, there was a child behind us, real young (not really yet old enough to "know better"), listening to a tablet that was playing the ABCs song. But the tablet had to be stowed for take-off (apparently). She forced the parent to take the tablet from child. Child threw a tantrum. I'm eye'ing the attendant like "you caused this. ABCs > bawling kid, and takeoff with the tablet would have been fine"

Re:IBM's Asshole Test by jdlshore on Thursday May 05, 2022 @02:37AM (#31270290)
Stowing large electronic items (bigger than a cell phone) is a safety requirement, and it’s likely that flight attendants have much less leeway in safety requirements than other aspects of the job.

(Please note that I’m not arguing that’s it’s a reasonable requirement, just that FAs likely don’t have the authority to ignore violations.)

Re:IBM's Asshole Test by FredPret on Thursday May 05, 2022 @10:20AM (#31273701)
If the plane crash lands during takeoff, all that stuff might catch fire/get in the way of a quick exit for the passengers crawling out