> he could've easily worked at Google, take advantage of the rising stock prices AND continue work on his SaaS.
Wouldn't Google then own all the code he wrote, even on his own SaaS sideproject?
Wouldn't Google then own all the code he wrote, even on his own SaaS sideproject?
I don't get why people are so upset at my comment or why that should warrant ad hominem attacks.
I merely mentioned that parent could've had a job at Google and benefited from it. He made it sound like it was a power move, it really wasn't. My argument is only that he took on even more risk by not taking advantage of Google's offer and growing stock prices to fund his passion. He doesn't seem like the type to get distracted by a day job either.