News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Criticizing Hare language approach for generic data structures. Parent comment

Re:Criticizing Hare language approach for generic data struc... by staticassertion on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @12:07PM (#31262376)
The most common for companies to have/ be required to have.

> I've worked in defense and there are stringent security requirements for applications and servers.

Like? FEDRAMP? The vast majority of compliance is about threat modeling and access controls.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Criticizing Hare language approach for generic data struc... by BaculumMeumEst on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @12:28PM (#31262661)
> Like? FEDRAMP?

No, STIGs.

> The vast majority of compliance is about threat modeling and access controls.

If compliance doesn't address security, that sounds like a bigger issue than a new hobby language existing.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Criticizing Hare language approach for generic data struc... by staticassertion on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @04:47PM (#31265652)
The issue is that no one is taking responsibility for writing safe software. Compliance / regulation isn't, developers aren't either.
[ Parent | on HN ]