News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Criticizing Hare language approach for generic data struc... by netr0ute on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @10:35AM (#31261037)
> Such as not wearing a mask, for example.

That's pretty rich

Re:Criticizing Hare language approach for generic data struc... by tonyg on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @11:22AM (#31261771)
How so? I'm sure you take my point: that by indulging selfish wants, we can harm others. Private situations, do what you like; shared or social contexts, not so much.
Re:Criticizing Hare language approach for generic data struc... by netr0ute on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @01:27PM (#31263403)
Masks don't even work for many of the things people want them to work for.
Re:Criticizing Hare language approach for generic data struc... by tonyg on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @01:44PM (#31263589)
Oh, hey! That makes them an even more perfect analogy. They help, massively, protecting others by removing many forms of transmission; but they don't prevent all transmission. Likewise, memory safety helps, massively, protecting others by removing many forms of security vulnerability; but it doesn't prevent all security vulnerability. And, crucially, not to get too far distracted from the original point: both are things we try to make use of where we can, not for ourselves, but for others and for the health of our overall communities. To really spell it out in words of one syllable: that's why people care about whether other people use memory safe languages.