News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft 3D Movie Maker Source Code by smcl on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @02:32AM (#31257397)
What a bizarre product to request though. You have to imagine that foone knew something about this being planned to be open sourced, or was somehow in on it. There's no way MS just go "sure why not?" when someone tweets out of the blue that they want source code to something.
Re:Microsoft 3D Movie Maker Source Code by yodon on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @03:05AM (#31257588)
The process was surprisingly close to "hey could you do this" followed by "that would be tricky, let me see what I can do" followed by "it's up on GitHub." Many kudos to Scott Hanselman and others at Microsoft for making this happen (and happen quickly) in response to foone's request.
Re:Microsoft 3D Movie Maker Source Code by shanselman on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @03:23AM (#31257693)
Yes, that’s what happened. They’ve been asking for a while, and I’ve tried a couple of times. But their last tweet got pretty good pick up, so I made another run at it. I asked the right Vice Presidents, found the right people to agree to the new license, retrieve the source from our company archivist, found two developers who worked on the actual project, and then worked with the Microsoft open source office to finalize everything, then released it. It took just about a month. I like doing things that people don’t think are possible. It’s literally as simple as that.
Re:Microsoft 3D Movie Maker Source Code by exikyut on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @03:24AM (#31257700)
> retrieve the source from our company archivist

Is this position hiring? :D

(New career goals: become high up enough in the company that I can decree that the open-source office and company archivist positions get merged into the same team.)

Re:Microsoft 3D Movie Maker Source Code by sitkack on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @12:14PM (#31262471)
It is also the person that has to hand repair corrupted Visual Source Safe databases with a hex editor.
Re:Microsoft 3D Movie Maker Source Code by smcl on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @03:33AM (#31257748)
Huh I stand corrected. Good news, either way :)