News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:There Is No CD Revival by Melatonic on Friday April 29, 2022 @01:11PM (#31207894)
The advantage of storing in FLAC though is that if you do want to encode to a more lossy format later you are not going to make the file worse than if you were to originally go from say .wav to mp3. Or if you wanted to manipulate the file later for use in a movie or something. Given that tons of players do FLAC these days and storage is relatively cheap I don't really see any advantage to using AAC.
Re:There Is No CD Revival by masklinn on Friday April 29, 2022 @01:29PM (#31208200)
> storage is relatively cheap

Server storage is relatively cheap, mobile storage is a different kettle of fish, and even with a lot of storage, if you have a large music collection it's much easier to blow way past with FLAC as it's at least an order of magnitude larger than even high-quality lossy tracks. I can't put my entire collection on my phone even after having converted it to a lossy format, putting the lossless masters is plain not an option.

And since conversion is easy to do, and to automate, really the only reason to put lossless tracks on a device other than the storage server where they live is sheer laziness.

Re:There Is No CD Revival by Melatonic on Friday April 29, 2022 @01:37PM (#31208328)
Thats sort of exactly what I was talking about - keep your FLAC files on a desktop at home and then compress as needed for a phone