News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Contractual Impossibility of Unwinding Disney’s Reedy... by vannevar on Friday April 29, 2022 @01:02PM (#31207756)
>The point is twofold. To send a message that dissent from the business community will not be tolerated. And, to keep stoking the fires of the culture wars.

I think the purpose was a lot more narrow: to position Ron DeSantis for the 2024 Republican Presidential primaries. Relatively small numbers of Republicans vote in the primaries, and they tend to be the angrier, more extreme wing. Donald Trump was nominated in 2016 despite a majority of Republican primary voters actually voting for other candidates. Once he was nominated, however, most Republicans fell into step and supported him.

Re:The Contractual Impossibility of Unwinding Disney’s Reedy... by AftHurrahWinch on Friday April 29, 2022 @01:13PM (#31207925)
> Relatively small numbers of Republicans vote in the primaries, and they tend to be the angrier, more extreme wing. Donald Trump was nominated in 2016 despite a majority of Republican primary voters actually voting for other candidates.

That strategy doesn't work as well if you get ranked choice voting or anything other than first-past-the-post.

https://reason.com/2022/04/28/florida-tennessee-ban-ranked-c...

...oh

Re:The Contractual Impossibility of Unwinding Disney’s Reedy... by loki49152 on Friday April 29, 2022 @01:41PM (#31208394)
Few people remember that Trump likely won the nomination due to "cross-over" voters in states with open primaries. There was an organized effort by Democrats to cross-vote for him as the Republican candidate under the belief that he couldn't possibly defeat Hillary Clinton in the actual election.

I don't know if there is a way to determine whether or not that effort actually succeeded, but it did exist and was spoken about with great pride until Trump became the President.