Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beautifying photo-filters

Re:Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beau... by oh_sigh on Thursday April 28, 2022 @05:19PM (#31198354)

I don't think it is a bad question to ask. In fact, there might even be negative biases against attractiveness for engineers. Will a dude with cheeto dust on his star wars t-shirt give a fair shake to a good looking woman who is wearing business attire and makeup, compared to another dude in a t-shirt?

Let's do a test. Who would you imagine is the better engineer of these two old timey people?

https://i.imgur.com/omRXYde.png

and

https://i.imgur.com/3QDIkme.png

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beau... by version_five on Thursday April 28, 2022 @05:27PM (#31198431)

There is definitely (well, anecdotally) negative bias against "well put together" attractive engineers. Picture a software engineer, male or female, chances are your stereotype isn't a glamorous person in a flashy suit with an expensive haircut and grooming. And if you saw someone like that, you'd be suspicious of their technical ability. It's a sterotype, but it's not all that weird.

I don't think it's necessarily about being attractive with all else being equal, it's more about the level of effort in one's appearance. Once that is accounted for, it's probably likely there is some of the usual bias towards better looking people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beau... by servercobra on Thursday April 28, 2022 @05:38PM (#31198536)

Also anecdotal: When I was freelancing, I'd specifically make sure to be wearing my glasses and a hoodie during the first meeting with potential clients. I had better responses and they seemed to implicitly trust that I was competent vs wearing contacts. Whereas on a dating profile/first dates, I would always wear contacts because I think I look more handsome that way.

Biases are frustrating and annoying and I used to think they weren't worth worrying about. Then I went from obese to healthy weight and noticed the ways people treated me differently. Now I acknowledge that they have an effect and try to remove my own, but it's not perfect.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beau... by bee_rider on Friday April 29, 2022 @03:03AM (#31202219)

There's a sweet spot I think. Wearing a suit? Probably a business guy, not to be trusted. But raggedy T-Shirt? Ah, that's just unprofessional. The ideal male fashion icon: Mr. Rogers, classy but not trying too hard, everybody trusts a nice sweater with a collared shirt under.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beau... by brimble on Thursday April 28, 2022 @05:32PM (#31198474)

> Will a dude with cheeto dust on his star wars t-shirt give a fair shake to a good looking woman who is wearing business attire and makeup

The Cheeto-dust legible-t-shirt look is unfashionable in tech and probably not a great idea. Been true since the late '00s at least. I think the put-together woman wins in that match up.

> compared to another dude in a t-shirt?

Depends. Is the t-shirt $150 retail, made of merino wool, and sporting a small brand logo that the interviewer will recognize from the gear lists on that minimalism/travel blog they really like?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beau... by Izkata on Thursday April 28, 2022 @06:46PM (#31199175)

IMO the second one doesn't look old-timey, just stylish.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beau... by floren on Thursday April 28, 2022 @08:43PM (#31200033)

He chose that one because it's Hedy Lamarr, movie star and electrical engineer

[ Parent | on HN ]