News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GNU Nano 6.3. Parent comment

Re:GNU Nano 6.3 by anthk on Thursday April 28, 2022 @12:30PM (#31194630)
Check jmacs from joe.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GNU Nano 6.3 by NelsonMinar on Thursday April 28, 2022 @12:48PM (#31194850)
Oh that's nice, somehow I never thought to try Joe. It's 13MB VSZ and 7MB RSS megabytes in my little measurement. emacs-nox is 94/22.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GNU Nano 6.3 by anthk on Thursday April 28, 2022 @01:54PM (#31195793)
"emacs -nw -q" can be pretty fast too.

Not light on resources compared to jmacs, but at least it loads faster.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GNU Nano 6.3 by microtherion on Thursday April 28, 2022 @04:11PM (#31197618)
There is also GNU zile.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GNU Nano 6.3 by a_e_k on Thursday April 28, 2022 @04:52PM (#31198052)
Or Mg, which is even smaller.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GNU Nano 6.3 by anthk on Thursday April 28, 2022 @05:14PM (#31198302)
The parent had issues with Unicode, which jmacs doesn't.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GNU Nano 6.3 by NelsonMinar on Friday April 29, 2022 @05:40PM (#31210864)
Does not support Unicode.
[ Parent | on HN ]