An update on the campaign to defend serious math education in California

Re:An update on the campaign to defend serious math educatio... by hn_throwaway_99 on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @08:49PM (#31174993)

You've misunderstood my post. I'm not arguing that needing to understand statistics is the same as needing to be able to read and write; I was responding to a post that was arguing that teaching stats without the underpinnings of calculus is like a society that is barely literate.

> Statistics is more complicated philosophically and computationally, as you do in fact need calculus to do statistics

This is just fundamentally false, as there are many statistical concepts and introductory statistics courses (given at some of the most renowned universities in the world) that can be taught without an underpinning of calculus. It's like arguing that you can't teach a programming class until someone understands digital logic design.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An update on the campaign to defend serious math educatio... by andrewprock on Wednesday April 27, 2022 @11:38AM (#31181335)

Again, philosophically and computationally, statistics is more complicated.

And again, you do need calculus to do statistics. Maybe you're saying: "If someone does the calculus part for you, you can use this one equation to solve this one question."

That's akin to calling a spelling test literature. You are confusing practice with knowledge. Anyone can bang on a drum. That does not make them a drummer.

[ Parent | on HN ]