Re:Book Review: A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoan...
by bbatha on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @08:20PM
(#31174795)
The conciseness of math and physics has to do with notation that’s been developed over centuries and taught over the course of over a decade to students in most developed countries. I’m sure if you went to your “Math for x non-stem degree” course at your local university you’d see students equally befuddled by a soup of notation and terms they haven’t encountered.
Re:Book Review: A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoan...
by mhh__ on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @09:50PM
(#31175347)
The notation exists because it can be applied to the field, because the field can be applied to reality. It's not solely invention.
Engineers love ruining physics but at very least they can still be ugly rather than bloated.
Re:Book Review: A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoan...
by lmt55 on Thursday April 28, 2022 @04:48AM
(#31190164)
Surely there is no connection between the appropriateness of the notation to the subject and the appropriateness of the subject to reality.
Non-Euclidean geometry has applications to reality, but before these applications were known, how did they determine that the notation would appropriately apply to the field?
Physics is concise, but more importantly can be wrong. I don't mind reading a bit of philosophy every now and again but at some point I just have to put it down because it's so long winded. Even ignoring the somewhat revealing tendency to borrow terminology from other subjects, there's no sense of urgency in the writing.
Perhaps it's best transmitted orally instead.