Re:An update on the campaign to defend serious math educatio...
by rayiner on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @08:46PM
(#31174978)
It's mind boggling to me that this Twitter fight gone wrong is a bigger deal to people than the lack of scientific rigor in Boaler's work.
Re:An update on the campaign to defend serious math educatio...
by ummonk on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @09:39PM
(#31175270)
No, the point is that the fight undermines Boaler’s use of the racism / equity card which she uses in response to critics of her work.
Re:An update on the campaign to defend serious math educatio...
by rayiner on Wednesday April 27, 2022 @10:38AM
(#31180436)
Oh, I missed the context: https://stanfordreview.org/boaler-professor/. I didn’t realize Boaler had a history of doing that (though I guess I’m not surprised). Prof. Nelson sounds like a champion.
Re:An update on the campaign to defend serious math educatio...
by lern_too_spel on Wednesday April 27, 2022 @02:18AM
(#31176900)
Boaler taught sixth and seventh grade math before becoming a professor of education. She might know how to teach pre-algebra concepts, but I do not believe she understands which high school math is most useful.
A lot of students in the US learn physics without calculus, which is basically useless. It's just a set of magic formulae to plug and chug. We should not go further in that direction but instead go in the other direction.
Re:An update on the campaign to defend serious math educatio...
by fn-mote on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @05:21PM
(#31173347)
> One of the lead proponents/authors is distinguished Stanford Professor Jo Boaler..
I have an issue with the parent's gossipy put-down of Professor Boaler.
I think it's important to emphasize that genuine intellectuals who have put serious thought into this proposal support it. I would prefer more serious engagement with it, even if on HN the majority disagree.
[0]: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Stanford-professor-Ka...