News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:To improve medical trials, justify exclusion criteria by jahewson on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @11:41AM (#31168894)
Oh the irony that you’ve excluded an investigation of the relevant example here, but made broad claims nonetheless.
Re:To improve medical trials, justify exclusion criteria by gumby on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @01:02PM (#31169988)
My note was clear that the package insert is insufficient for prescribing. It is explicitly marked so -- see a comment I wrote to another reply to my GP comment.
Re:To improve medical trials, justify exclusion criteria by throwanem on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @01:48PM (#31170703)
Totally unrelated, but just briefly to say, thanks for your work with Cygnus.

I doubt I'd have been able to build a career for myself in software engineering without Cygwin being available and lively back in the days when I was required to use Windows fulltime, and along with that I learned a lot from working with it that's been of great help to me ever since. And I'm to this day running Cygwin on the one Windows box I still maintain!

So, thanks for whatever hand you had in that. If you ever find yourself in Baltimore and thirsty, hit me up and I'll buy you that beer or other suitable beverage I owe you. :D