News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by filoleg on Friday April 22, 2022 @04:01PM (#31127302)
> though not a latino and not in the US, so I wasn't yet under any pressure to use it

To be fair, I've literally never heard anyone try to pronounce "latinx" outloud. And I live in one of the most stereotypical liberal/left-wing cities in the US (Seattle). The usage of that term seems to be mostly confined to a vocal twitter/internet minority and written form (whether online or in promotional materials for certain things).

Even here, this term is extremely fringe irl. And I don't think I've ever felt pressured to use it either, given I've never heard it in use (despite my friend group having a couple of people who are very left-leaning and are vocal about it).

I guess tl;dr, don't mistake a fringe vocal minority on the internet for an accurate representation of what it is like to actually live in the US (even when it comes to certain most heavily stereotyped big cities).

Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by nullc on Friday April 22, 2022 @04:26PM (#31127608)
> To be fair, I've literally never heard anyone try to pronounce "latinx" outloud,

I guess you quit listening to NPR before they started using that one. It's ubiquitous now.

What was it that made you quit?

> Don't mistake fringe vocal minorities on the internet for an accurate representation of what it is like to actually live in the US.

They I agree, though this particular example is not just internet fringe.

Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by filoleg on Friday April 22, 2022 @05:24PM (#31128358)
Nothing made me quit NPR, i just prefer to consume it in the same form as most of my news-related stuff, in written form. Nothing against listening or watching it, i just find it easier to process things like that by reading.

With that in mind, i guess i mostly meant "people you actually talk to or hear talking not in public news media" when i said that i dont ever hear it said outloud.

Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by nullc on Friday April 22, 2022 @05:30PM (#31128416)
Yeah, fair point. Unless your social circles include ultratwittered people and/or media personalities you'll likely never hear it in meatspace-- even living in the bay area.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by xg15 on Friday April 22, 2022 @05:49PM (#31128627)
I mean, media has enormous influence. If a term is constantly present in every newscast, movie or newspaper around you, people will probably start using it at some point.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by filoleg on Friday April 22, 2022 @06:11PM (#31128862)
> people will probably start using it at some point.

I am not disagreeing with you, and sure, your future prediction is not out of the realm of possibilities. I am just saying that I am yet to see it happen as of today. And I don't really care to be outraged about something that isn't a thing yet.

It isn't global warming or some other thing that is difficult to reverse or has some life/death stakes. Language has been perpetually changing, and still is. Really fast, and really wildly. So making a trouble out of "this one word might become used in future in real life at some point, so you should worry about it now" is not something I am really into wasting energy on.