Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very broken

Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by filoleg on Friday April 22, 2022 @05:24PM (#31128358)

Nothing made me quit NPR, i just prefer to consume it in the same form as most of my news-related stuff, in written form. Nothing against listening or watching it, i just find it easier to process things like that by reading.

With that in mind, i guess i mostly meant "people you actually talk to or hear talking not in public news media" when i said that i dont ever hear it said outloud.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by nullc on Friday April 22, 2022 @05:30PM (#31128416)

Yeah, fair point. Unless your social circles include ultratwittered people and/or media personalities you'll likely never hear it in meatspace-- even living in the bay area.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by xg15 on Friday April 22, 2022 @05:49PM (#31128627)

I mean, media has enormous influence. If a term is constantly present in every newscast, movie or newspaper around you, people will probably start using it at some point.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by filoleg on Friday April 22, 2022 @06:11PM (#31128862)

> people will probably start using it at some point.

I am not disagreeing with you, and sure, your future prediction is not out of the realm of possibilities. I am just saying that I am yet to see it happen as of today. And I don't really care to be outraged about something that isn't a thing yet.

It isn't global warming or some other thing that is difficult to reverse or has some life/death stakes. Language has been perpetually changing, and still is. Really fast, and really wildly. So making a trouble out of "this one word might become used in future in real life at some point, so you should worry about it now" is not something I am really into wasting energy on.

[ Parent | on HN ]