News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by CoastalCoder on Friday April 22, 2022 @01:28PM (#31124940)
I'm pretty skeptical of labor unions in the U.S., but I can see how they could help with this kind of issue.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by bombcar on Friday April 22, 2022 @01:49PM (#31125353)
I'm not sure they wouldn't be on the forefront of coming up with new words to add to the lists.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by morgante on Friday April 22, 2022 @05:24PM (#31128361)
They 100% would be. In fact, people in the Alphabet Union are on the forefront of DEI initiatives like this.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by cornel_io on Friday April 22, 2022 @03:49PM (#31127141)
Unfortunately most of the people pushing hardest for unionization in tech are exactly the same people pushing the woke craziness. In fact, one of the main reasons they want unions so badly is to use them to make more and more insane social justice-ey demands and add the illusion that there is broad worker support for them.

They do this with the knowledge that most people won't stand up against them out of fear, even though they don't agree with them - the sociopathic Google walkout organizers leveraged this to great effect when they collected signatures and then changed the text of what people had already signed to be a psychotic list of unreasonable demands, knowing that it'd be career suicide for any of us to complain publicly about it (there wasn't much public noise but a lot of us were really pissed about that privately). Surprise, surprise, the overlap between that group and the group later pushing for unionization was nearly 100%.