And for telecommunications, which are definitely in the "utility" category now, subsidies for the up-front capital costs are warranted IMHO, especially as it can act as an economic accelerator.
As for contemporary wifi, that's why I had my house wired for Cat 6 a few months back - I've got 3 Wifi 6 access points as well (PoE powered, ceiling mounted) and can saturate my 500/70 FTTP connection.
I think the key thing here is that probably yes, however it is essentially once off. Not that expensive to keep shooting photons down the fibre once its in the ground.
So from a country perspective that's a pretty grand deal compared to say farming subsidies that you need to do annually.
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
ua.pool.ntp.org .POOL. 16 p - 64 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
*62.149.0.30 .GPS. 1 u 353 1024 377 0.702 0.063 0.105
+91.236.251.13 105.240.56.33 2 u 40 1024 377 3.825 -0.068 0.466
-195.78.244.50 91.198.10.4 3 u 171 1024 377 17.445 3.617 0.251
-162.159.200.1 10.132.8.165 3 u 615 1024 377 0.460 2.218 0.115
-162.159.200.123 10.132.8.165 3 u 806 1024 377 0.489 2.212 0.104
-91.236.251.12 105.240.56.33 2 u 46 1024 377 3.879 -0.522 1.551
-91.236.251.129 118.188.39.164 2 u 58 1024 377 5.025 -0.056 0.293
-193.106.144.7 31.28.161.68 2 u 368 1024 377 6.991 1.203 0.120
+31.28.161.68 .GPS. 1 u 961 1024 377 0.543 0.152 0.134But this is on "home-network" technologies - they have their equipment distributed over buildings and have not central core, so this is cheaper, but lacks some things which seem normal for telecoms.
It is very reliable, easy achieve less than 5 hours of downtime per month. Most downtime because somebody steal equipment from attic, or somebody tried to steal fiber cables, thinking it is copper.
Example trace (skipped not necessary info):
traceroute -q 2 -w 1 --resolve-hostnames www.amazon.com
traceroute to d3ag4hukkh62yn.cloudfront.net (52.84.115.95), 64 hops max
2 94.244.0.210 (rusanovka-uaix.elan-ua.net) 0.519ms 0.432ms
3 193.239.72.201 (ae2-166-gw0.g50.kv.dataline.ua) 0.556ms 0.550ms
4 10.204.215.47 (10.204.215.47) 45.048ms 8.404ms
5 193.239.74.62 (amazon.dataline.ua) 27.452ms 27.259ms
6 * *
7 * *
8 150.222.27.44 (150.222.27.44) 41.083ms 41.283ms
9 150.222.27.197 (150.222.27.197) 40.665ms 40.495ms
BTW could somebody give link, on what template engine uses HN, so I will post structured text. Thanks in advance!
very much. In early 2000 I consulted for small defense contractor trying to win bids providing internet to rural Spain. They made me cobble together an absolute garbage solution of slow early Sat (the ~1 second latency kind) internet with Wifi last mile. It barely worked for anything other than mail, browsing web was pure suffering, gaming was out of the question. Thankfully this venture went nowhere, but even with very expensive Satellite uplink finances still made some sense considering the remoteness of locations.
I often wonder at observations like this whether it's the result of massive subsidies or massive over-subscription of the infrastructure. How is actual bandwidth/jitter on that line? Romania also has bold claims about infrastructure penetration, it's a fair example of somewhere I'd have good reason to doubt their credibility.
A stable loss/jitter-free FTTP connection at 50 GBP/mo. is very much value for money compared to an equivalent line featuring loss/latency/jitter at even a tenth of that price and with 10x the claimed line rate.
Separately, I have put off gigabit installation numerous times over 6 years simply because I can't really benefit from it on contemporary WiFi.
(Also yes, on re-reading my comment I realize I am a bit jealous of your setup in Portugal ;)