News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA... by bin_bash on Thursday April 21, 2022 @07:17AM (#31108029)
Then demonetize it, don’t remove it.
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA... by xattt on Thursday April 21, 2022 @08:02AM (#31108347)
I might be missing the point, but I’m not getting this glorification of stupid acts.
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA... by mannykannot on Thursday April 21, 2022 @09:01AM (#31108795)
It is annoying to see idiots get a lot of attention, but really, it is not a glorification of a stupid act, it is just a video of one. Furthermore, it would live on in all of those videos that point out just how stupid it was, unless Youtube also removes those - but they are informative, I would say.
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA... by ineedasername on Thursday April 21, 2022 @09:20AM (#31108995)
I'm generally in favor of idiots that do illegal things then posting video evidence of them online. I don't think it glorifies the act if YouTube then demonetized the video with a note & link back to the FAA's ruling. Showing stupid things & their consequences seems reasonable.
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA... by Beldin on Thursday April 21, 2022 @02:15PM (#31113196)
Would you feel the same if this became the top watched video for weeks, with a lively comment section mostly leaning towards "omg that is so cool! I want to top this!!!"?

I wouldn't - which is why I don't mind if it's taken down.

Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA... by ineedasername on Thursday April 21, 2022 @04:53PM (#31115044)
I'm hesitant to advocate taking something down. I'm not saying it should never happen, but this doesn't cross the threshold for me. In this instance the video creator wasn't encouraging people to do this and the audience response wasn't to jump in and do the same thing. Also videos that would fit this category-- filmed evidence of illegal activity & subsequent consequences (which I think Google should add to the video)-- are not likely to become popular in the thought experiment you describe. If they did, maybe I'd revisit my opinion.

On the other hand, if content is encouraging people to do harmful or dangerous things then that becomes a different issue. I'm less uncomfortable with YouTube trying to stop Tide Pod Challenge videos which were basically encouraging such activity: The first two weeks of 2018 saw about as many poisoning reports from this as most entire years before then. [1]

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20220412042754/https://time.com/...

Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA... by jaywalk on Thursday April 21, 2022 @09:03AM (#31108809)
What glorification? This is a thing that happened, and it's incredibly newsworthy. Prevent him from profiting off the video and leave it up. There is no reason to do anything further from YouTube's perspective.
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA... by MauranKilom on Thursday April 21, 2022 @09:04AM (#31108826)
How is "treat this video like any other video" (i.e. do nothing) a "glorification"? There are tons of videos of incredibly stupid and dangerous acts on YouTube.
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA... by xboxnolifes on Thursday April 21, 2022 @12:30PM (#31111596)
The existence of something is not glorifying it.