News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:You probably don’t need AWS and are better off without it by Aea on Wednesday April 20, 2022 @04:46PM (#31102792)
NAT is $1/day *PER* AZ *PER* VPC.

Managed NAT Gateways can be a very substantial cost depending on your architecture. I believe the recommended VPC layout has 3 AZs so you're paying close to $100/month for a single VPC just for NAT.

Re:You probably don’t need AWS and are better off without it by pojzon on Wednesday April 20, 2022 @05:20PM (#31103160)
Ding ding ding, ppl here dont take to account HA and disaster preventions you sometimes have to abaid to due to security certifications and regulations!
Re:You probably don’t need AWS and are better off without it by hayd on Wednesday April 20, 2022 @05:50PM (#31103509)
So your comparison with your $5 local lab is not just less "convenient"!

Do you really need multi-multi-region failover redundancy? Do you really need multiple NATs in every region (it's easy to share one NAT Gateway across AZs, especially so if a region is only servicing DR)? Your numbers still sound high.

x $1 + y $0.60 to make up $30 is a _lot_ of regions/AZs.

Re:You probably don’t need AWS and are better off without it by rstupek on Wednesday April 20, 2022 @07:56PM (#31104568)
Yes the $5/month lab setup compared to a globally redundant service.