News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:M1 Thunderbolt ports don’t fully support USB 3.1 Gen 2 by colejohnson66 on Monday April 18, 2022 @11:12AM (#31071779)
> Feel free to point out exactly which argument you feel was ignored.

The retroactive renaming of speed+versions. I'm not talking about the Mac.

> If you pick up a USB3.1 device you know beforehand it won't support SuperSpeed+ 2x or 4x.

My whole argument is that this confusion wouldn't be an issue if the USB Consortium had reserved USB 3.1 for 10 Gb/sec speeds exclusively. In other words, this:

    3.0: 5 Gb/s  "SuperSpeed"
    3.1: 10 Gb/s "SuperSpeed+"
    3.2: 20 Gb/s "SuperSpeed++"
That, and that alone (with none of the "Gen" nonsense) would avoid confusion. Then, if I pick up a USB 3.1 device, I would know it's 10 Gb/sec "SuperSpeed+" without having to use a stupid "generation" number. But no, the USB Consortium decided to deprecate 3.0 and 3.1 because all new devices are "3.2 Gen whatever". That's confusion.
Re:M1 Thunderbolt ports don’t fully support USB 3.1 Gen 2 by dwaite on Monday April 18, 2022 @12:38PM (#31073052)
Versions are not speeds.

3.2 continues to describe everything in 3.0, which means it continues to describe how to make devices supporting 5 gbps over USB-A/B

Re:M1 Thunderbolt ports don’t fully support USB 3.1 Gen 2 by floatboth on Monday April 18, 2022 @08:49PM (#31078589)
Well, the argument is that versions not being speeds anymore is the problem and it would've been easier if they were. Like they are in Wi-Fi for example.
Re:M1 Thunderbolt ports don’t fully support USB 3.1 Gen 2 by Dylan16807 on Monday April 18, 2022 @04:48PM (#31076318)
If you use the smallest version number that fits your device, then you avoid confusion.