Re:Why is GIMP still so bad?
by andrewshadura on Monday April 18, 2022 @10:49AM
(#31071403)
I find the interface of GIMP not only consistent and well designed, but actually more consistent and well designed than the interface of Photoshop.
> as if the way it ended up looking was the only way someone managed to get it to work using default GTK widgets.
want to guess what G in GTK originally stood for? that's right, GIMP.
GIMP invented that toolkit because they needed one. the fact that their user interface has some hairy technical debt is not the least bit surprising.
Many grievances with GIMP stem from the way how things are done. Where Blender had a weird, but rationally thought out and consistent UX, GIMPs user interface feels weird and inconsistent — as if the way it ended up looking was the only way someone managed to get it to work using default GTK widgets.
This might seem like a luxury problem, but it is really not — an intuitive and consistent user interface is crucial in an image editor that most people fire up just to get stuff done. I'd even argue that is more important than a lot of other things.
Try out Krita as well, might be not as much geared towards photo editing, but has a much more consistent UX.