News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by RaymondDeWitt on Thursday April 14, 2022 @01:35PM (#31030313)
How was Musk's offer - a public disclosure with few conditions or contingencies, made in bad faith? At face value, it does not violate basic standards of honesty or appear to deliberately mislead.
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by colinmhayes on Thursday April 14, 2022 @02:01PM (#31030748)
At face value Musk has a history of paying large SEC fines because he lied to investors.
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by memish on Friday April 15, 2022 @09:17AM (#31039887)
From TED yesterday.

"Funding was indeed secured. I should say I do not have respect for the SEC in that situation. I don’t mean to blame everyone at the SEC, but certainly the San Francisco office. The SEC knew that funding was secured. They pursued an active public investigation, nonetheless. I was forced to concede to the SEC unlawfully."

Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by colinmhayes on Friday April 15, 2022 @10:45AM (#31040836)
I don't think him saying that makes it true. He certainly never brought Tesla private or brought a serious offer to do so.
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by jjeaff on Thursday April 14, 2022 @01:49PM (#31030530)
It's another 420 reference just like his claim to have financing ready to take Tesla private which turned out to be false and just a joke.
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by RC_ITR on Thursday April 14, 2022 @03:41PM (#31032266)
I implore you to do what I suggested in the parent comment.

How many times is “non-binding” said in the document?

Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by mdoms on Thursday April 14, 2022 @01:50PM (#31030540)
You mean like his offer to take Tesla private - a public disclosure with few conditions or contingencies?